Dr_Dave wrote:Interesting stuff for sure. My take on a few points that have been discussed.
Gusty - Is the same as adding randomness to any shot. It becomes pot luck and not a measure of players ability to compensate for the condition.
But our beloved game is already nothing but randomness Dr Dave. Each of us that tees up in the same event gets different wind conditions (direction) to play in. One gets the wind with him and the other against and the rest somewhere in-between.
Dr_Dave wrote:Timed rounds - Absurd! Just like speed chess and regular chess. I love the game but I don't play speed chess. And that's not even taking into consideration interruptions like phone calls, pets, children, spouse, reviewing shots to see what happened, talking and laughing with friends while you play etc. etc. etc..
But no one is asking for speed chess play. Just NOT World Championship Chess play speed where they can play one match for days at a time.
Dr_Dave wrote:Waiting in windy and breezy rounds - Waiting for it to die down or for it to be constant, big difference. Once at the ball I take a fraction of the time compared to a Pro in breezy or windy conditions. Just whacking the ball without figuring out the shot or the wind/breeze to be some what constant is a style of play that many may not enjoy!
I know it's early in the poll, but so far it's split fairly equal. Just a thought, if they have tournaments that 50% don't like playing, what is accomplished?
But does anyone actually play with out at least doing some consideration to the wind? Some do take longer than others, as you say the IRL Pros do (drives me crazy too), but the complaint is the incessant waiting that some do because of the games now used system of finally dying down. Eliminate that propensity in the game programming and the long wait is eliminated.
As to the 50/50 split vote, that is probably the same split you would get on any question about play you poll about Links. I bet that playing in ammy events would also get a 50/50 split if polled.
Jerry