Moderators: DavidCass, Bruce Bo
Larry_Warrilow wrote:doc, my original philosophy as to adding files to the tour course list was exactly as you have remarked, and would have been tightly restricted. however i now think that warren's policy of adding the maximum number of files on demand is for the best. by far the vast majority of the new apcd files work just fine, and those few that have serious problems will be reported as the players encounter them. some few of those problem files will be unusable on tour, but others will not be any more problematic than files we have been dealing with for years.
while i'm sure not clairvoyant, the apcd courses i've chosen for my own weekly event for 35 weeks have been architecturally sound, and i've played even the new ones myself without mishap enough times that i know they will be successful venues. that's not to say that when players report problems on new apcds that i'm going to ignore the warnings. i just want to see for myself. lw
________
Dr_Dave wrote:I'm pretty sure no one wants to go into the grass, but one shot shouldn't mean the end of a tournament. As you know there are many trees at Awaba that overhang the fairway, the designer blocked the overhanging tree instead of following the contour of the tree. My ball hit the invisible wall outside the tree dimensions and it bounced into the tall grass. That was the it, I could not get out of the grass and 22 shots later I gave up.
A well designed course should also include the obstacles and rough areas not just the fairways. They can keep all the courses as far as I'm concerned, I keep a list of poorly designed courses for my records. My thread was merely letting people know that I re-created the tournament based on the problems I encountered which others witnessed.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests