by Larry_Warrilow on Tue May 22, 2007 8:33 am
bruce, both steve pitts and myself conducted surveys using different techniques, but our results were almost identical. the stats themselves are probably no longer available, but mark may well have them tucked away someplace.
steve's method was to crunch each difficulty level's stats as a whole over a season, and mine was to use smaller targeted samples, but still over a broad range of rankings and flights at both pro and champ.
at the very highest rankings at each level, there was little overall difference in results whether the rts or click swing type was used, but in individual matchups there could be a pretty big gap on any given day. the studs are so good that they don't readily fall into a finely predictible statistical range like we average players.
as you must have noted, all of my conclusions about click, and rts were based on the ability of average players (85% of all links players fall more or less into the mainstream ability population based on a normal distribution curve). nobody has to believe these conclusions at this late date when the main tour data is no longer available, but the players themselves have been reporting the same results since 2k3 was released. it's the main reason that the tour admin started putting up separate events for each swing type every week, because we could demonstrate the statistical difference in results based on swing type on each level.
if you insist, i may be able to dig up my own raw numbers, but the stats they were based on, to my knowlege, are no longer available. steve pitts, as of a year ago, had a personal web site with some of these results posted among other interesting links facts, but he hasn't played links since the indie site folded. lw
___________