I'm sure you are not alone in this opinion, but let me offer an alternative perspective. For context, consider next year's US Open site, Oakmont which was designed as well in the early 1900's.
Whether a sloping piece of grass is labeled "the green", or it is instead (as it will be next year), ankle high rough, the players have more than enough information to determine how far to hit the ball.
The wonderful thing that happens at Pinehurst is that when shots do miss the green (often after first visiting the green), players have a wide variety of shot choices. Though not my original plan yesterday, I ended up behind the 2nd green and watched the final 16 groups play that hole. 2 is a very hard green to hit, so we saw a great variety of different shots played when the green was missed. Different players whose ball ended up close to each other over the green would sometimes chip, and sometimes putt. Next year, there will be only one shot---the gouge from the thick rough.
Afterwards I shifted to hole 8 and then later to hole 14 to watch the final 5 or 6 groups play. So I saw DeChambeau's great par on hole 8. I was positioned about 40 yards short of the green on the right. For his 3rd shot, he could have chosen bump and run as well. In my opinion, that shot was harder (for a professional) than the sand shot he hit on #18 (though that of course was also a hard shot). The reason is that for the shot on hole 18, he knew he had a slope that would roll the ball towards the hole. On hole 8, it was going to roll away from the hole (or else he had to risk hitting the same shot again). There is very little room on the top shelf on hole 8 to stop a ball, and it's 8 to 10 feet above where he played from.
Also, next year at Oakmont, barring rain, you will see the greens play much firmer than they had them set up at Pinehurst. So you will see balls bouncing off the green into the thick rough rather than rolling off the green as this year. I don't know about fair or not fair, but it will be different.
My two cents (though I paid much more than that to be an eyewitness!),
Ronnie
GoesForIt wrote:Just an observation about the IRL U. S. Open. I know the USGA can make a course tough. They love 18 on the stimpmeter. But IMO, even though it's equal for all, I don't think Pinehurst is a fair test.
I mean, if you decide to create a green a certain size and a player hits on that green it doesn't seem to me that his ball ought to end up 20, 30, 40 feet off the green.
I hope they don't go back there for a long, long time.